Here are all the actual test exam dumps for IT exams. Most people prepare for the actual exams with our test dumps to pass their exams. So it's critical to choose and actual test pdf to succeed.

Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Topic 1 Question 185 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 185
Topic #: 1
Did OptiFlow comply with ISO/IEC 42001 requirements when establishing its AI objectives? Refer to Scenario 2.
Scenario 2: OptiFlow is a logistics company located in New Delhi, India. The company has enhanced its operational efficiency and customer service by integrating AI across various domains, including route optimization, inventory management, and customer support. Recognizing the importance of AI in its operations, OptiFlow decided to implement an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001 to oversee and optimize the use of AI technologies.
To address Clauses 4.1 and 4.2 of the standard, OptiFlow identified and analyzed internal and external issues and needs and expectations of interested parties. During this phase, it identified specific risks and opportunities related to AI deployment, considering the system's domain, application context, intended use, and internal and external environments. Central to this initiative was the establishment and maintenance of AI risk criteria, a foundational step that facilitated comprehensive AI risk assessments, effective risk treatment strategies, and precise evaluations of risk impacts. This implementation aimed to meet AIMS's objectives, minimize adverse effects, and promote continuous improvement. OptiFlow also planned and integrated strategies to address risks and opportunities into AIMS's processes and assessed their effectiveness.
OptiFlow set measurable AI objectives aligned with its AI policy across all organizational levels, ensuring they met applicable requirements and matched the company's vision. The company placed strong emphasis on the monitoring and communication of these objectives, ensuring they were updated annually or as needed to reflect changes in technology, market demands, or internal processes. It also documented the objectives, making them accessible across the company.
To guarantee a structured and consistent AI risk assessment process, OptiFlow emphasized alignment with its AI policy and objectives. The process included ensuring consistency and comparability, identifying, analyzing, and evaluating AI risks.
OptiFlow prioritizes its AIMS by allocating the necessary resources for its comprehensive development and continuous enhancement. The company carefully defines the competencies needed for personnel affecting AI performance, ensuring a high level of expertise and innovation.
OptiFlow also manages effective internal and external communications about its AIMS, aligning with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements by maintaining and controlling all required documented information. This documentation is meticulously identified, described, and updated to ensure its relevance and accessibility.
Through these strategic efforts, OptiFlow upholds a commitment to excellence and leadership in AI management practices.
To comply with Clause 9 of ISO/IEC 42001, the company determined what needs to be monitored and measured in the AIMS. It planned, established, implemented, and maintained an audit program, reviewed the AIMS at planned intervals, documented review results, and initiated a continuous feedback mechanism from all interested parties to identify areas of improvement and innovation within the AIMS

Suggested Answer: B Vote an answer

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 6.2 requires organizations to:
* Establish AI objectives that are measurable and aligned with the AI policy.
* Ensure objectives are monitored, communicated, and updated as appropriate.
* Take into account applicable requirements, risks, opportunities, and system changes.
In the scenario:
* OptiFlow defined measurable AI objectives aligned with the AI policy.
* Objectives were updated annually or as needed - satisfying the "as appropriate" update condition.
* The company ensured communication and accessibility of objectives across the organization.
Option A is incorrect - the standard does not mandate biannual updates.
Option C is also incorrect - although environmental impact may be considered depending on organizational context, it is not mandated for all AI objectives.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 6.2 - AI objectives and planning
* PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide, Chapter 6.2
\===========

by Martha at Jul 25, 2026, 05:41 AM

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Nick name: Submit Cancel
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.