Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT) - JN0-694 Free Exam Questions

QUESTION NO: 1
You have configured OSPF between two routers and the adjacency is not coming up. You confirm that the physical link between them is up and then run the commands shown in the exhibit on both routers.
Which two configuration mistakes apply? (Choose two.)

QUESTION NO: 2
You are troubleshooting a problem where external routes are not being summarized into the OSPF backbone.

Referring to the exhibit, what needs to be done to resolve this problem?

QUESTION NO: 3
-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
The exhibit shows a small switched network, some details about the MSTP configuration in the network, and the VLANs that are trunked over each link. When Switch2 reboots, users in VLAN 400 on Switch3 report that they lose connectivity to resources in VLAN 400 on Switch4.
What is the cause of this problem?

QUESTION NO: 4
-- Exhibit -user@router# run show log ospf-test ... Jun 10 22:35:38.598494 OSPF sent Hello 10.100.0.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:38.598520 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:38.598543 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:38.598564 dead_ivl 32, DR 10.100.0.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:41.522956 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.200.26.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276196 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798220 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798311 Version 2, length 48, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798334 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798356 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:42.798377 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 10.100.0.1
Jun 10 22:35:45.189034 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:45.189097 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189118 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189140 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.189162 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.196969 OSPF DR is 10.100.1.2, BDR is 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.197050 OSPF sent Hello 10.200.26.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/0.0 IFL 69 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:45.197076 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.1 Jun 10 22:35:45.197098 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.197119 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.200.26.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:46.746900 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.100.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276196
area 0.0.0.0) -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF neighborship with two directly connected routers using interface ge-1/0/3 from reaching the full state?

QUESTION NO: 5
-- Exhibit - -- Exhibit -

Click the Exhibit button.
Your network has two connections to your ISP. You have been asked to load-balance traffic across both links that connect to your ISP. You have enabled multipath for this peer, but you are still not getting the expected load balancing.
Given the information shown in the exhibit, what else must you do?

QUESTION NO: 6
You want to receive routes from a remote EBGP peer as shown in the exhibit. The remote site has the same AS number as your own. You have successfully established the EBGP peering, but are not receiving any routes.
Which BGP group configuration parameter will enable you to receive routes from the remote EBGP peer?