PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Actual Tests : PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager

The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager exam has a reputation for tripping up even experienced professionals. Actual4test built its ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager practice test around 80 expert-verified questions so you can walk in knowing what to expect.

PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Overview:

PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

Everything You Want to Know About the PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager Sample Questions:

Question 1

What is the purpose of incident categorization within the incident management lifecycle?

A. To determine the priority of incidents
B. To sort incidents based on the disrupted IT or business domain
C. To automatically assign incidents to technicians

Question 2

Scenario 3: L&K Associates is a graphic design firm headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. It specializes in providing innovative and creative design solutions to clients across various industries. With offices in multiple parts of the country, they effectively serve clients, delivering design solutions that meet their unique needs and preferences.
In its commitment to maintaining information security, L&K Associates is implementing an information security incident management process guided by ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2. Leona, the designated leader overseeing the implementation of the incident management process, customized the scope of incident management to align with the organization's unique requirements. This involved specifying the IT systems, services, and personnel involved in the incident management process while excluding potential incident sources beyond those directly related to IT systems and services.
Based on scenario 3, did Leona follow all the ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines when communicating the information security incident management policy to interested parties?

A. Yes, she effectively communicated the outcomes of incidents and strategies to minimize recurrence, meeting the necessary communication requirements
B. No, she should also communicate the incident reporting procedures and specify the appropriate contact for further information
C. No, she should also communicate how often the information security incident policies are updated and revised

Question 3

Scenario 2: NoSpace, a forward-thinking e-commerce store based in London, is renowned for its diverse products and advanced technology. To enhance its information security, NoSpace implemented an ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 to better protect customer data and ensure business continuity. Additionally, the company adopted ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. Mark, the incident manager at NoSpace, strategically led the entire implementation. He played a crucial role in aligning the company's ISMS with the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 27001, using ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines as the foundation.
During a routine internal audit, a minor anomaly was detected in the data traffic that could potentially indicate a security threat. Mark was immediately notified to assess the situation. Then, Mark and his team immediately escalated the incident to crisis management to handle the potential threat without further assessment. The decision was made to ensure a swift response.
After resolving the situation, Mark decided to update the incident management process. During the initial phase of incident management, Mark recognized the necessity of updating NoSpace's information security policies. This included revising policies related to risk management at the organizational level as well as for specific systems, services, or networks. The second phase of the updated incident management process included the assessment of the information associated with occurrences of information security events and the importance of classifying events and vulnerabilities as information security incidents. During this phase, he also introduced a 'count down' process to expedite the evaluation and classification of occurrences, determining whether they should be recognized as information security incidents.
Mark developed a new incident management policy to enhance the organization's resilience and adaptability in handling information security incidents. Starting with a strategic review session with key stakeholders, the team prioritized critical focus areas over less impactful threats, choosing not to include all potential threats in the policy document. This decision was made to keep the policy streamlined and actionable, focusing on the most significant risks identified through a risk assessment. The policy was shaped by integrating feedback from various department heads to ensure it was realistic and enforceable. Training and awareness initiatives were tailored to focus only on critical response roles, optimizing resource allocation and focusing on essential capabilities.
Based on scenario 2, was Mark's information security incident management policy appropriately developed?

A. Yes, the information security incident management policy was appropriately developed
B. No, he should have outlined any awareness and training initiatives within the organization that are related to incident management
C. No, the purpose of the information security incident management policy was not appropriately defined, as it failed to address all potential threats

Question 4

What role does the incident coordinator play during the response phase?

A. Initiating the response actions immediately
B. Assessing if the event is a potential or confirmed security incident
C. Coordinating the activities of IRTs and monitoring response time

Question 5

What is the purpose of a gap analysis?

A. To assess risks associated with identified gaps in current practices compared to best practices
B. To identify the differences between current processes and company policies
C. To determine the steps to achieve a desired future state from the current state

Solutions: